<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lisp is a problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nextyme.net/blog/2004/08/10/lisp-is-a-problem/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nextyme.net/blog/2004/08/10/lisp-is-a-problem/</link>
	<description>The personal blog of Me (and some other random people I've met).</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Archaeopterix</title>
		<link>http://www.nextyme.net/blog/2004/08/10/lisp-is-a-problem/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Archaeopterix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 16:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextyme.net/blog/?p=67#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I believe your criticism of Lisp is fair. Is a good language, but it was dumped by the mainstream and right now it doesn't have standards for:
- Networking
- Threads
- GUI
- C/C++ bindings
There are Allegro and LispWorks which are flipping expensive and a program in one of them doesn't necesarily runs in the other. GNU lisps lacks a lot of things and they're also not standard. So lispheads go and fix your language. Jump from Common to New Standard Lisp. Yes, prepare a new standard with all the missing stuff, except perhaps the GUI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe your criticism of Lisp is fair. Is a good language, but it was dumped by the mainstream and right now it doesn&#8217;t have standards for:<br />
- Networking<br />
- Threads<br />
- GUI<br />
- C/C++ bindings<br />
There are Allegro and LispWorks which are flipping expensive and a program in one of them doesn&#8217;t necesarily runs in the other. GNU lisps lacks a lot of things and they&#8217;re also not standard. So lispheads go and fix your language. Jump from Common to New Standard Lisp. Yes, prepare a new standard with all the missing stuff, except perhaps the GUI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goom</title>
		<link>http://www.nextyme.net/blog/2004/08/10/lisp-is-a-problem/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>goom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 13:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextyme.net/blog/?p=67#comment-25</guid>
		<description>You dope, it's Lisp, not LISP.  No capitals.

And to answer the question at the very end of this long, rambling, silly post, follow this link:

  http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You dope, it&#8217;s Lisp, not LISP.  No capitals.</p>
<p>And to answer the question at the very end of this long, rambling, silly post, follow this link:</p>
<p>  <a href="http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book" rel="nofollow">http://www.gigamonkeys.com/book</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el jefe</title>
		<link>http://www.nextyme.net/blog/2004/08/10/lisp-is-a-problem/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>el jefe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nextyme.net/blog/?p=67#comment-21</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry, but I think you're terribly rude and insensitive. Having a lisp is no reason to accuse someone of having a problem. How dare you?

:)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I think you&#8217;re terribly rude and insensitive. Having a lisp is no reason to accuse someone of having a problem. How dare you?<br />
 <img src='http://www.nextyme.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.565 seconds -->
